Source A
Bank, processor, custodian, broker, platform, or operational record.
Use financial reconciliation to compare transactions and balances across banks, ledgers, payment providers, investment records, and internal systems. Mimasa uses AI agents and governed workflows to prepare matches, explain differences, and route exceptions.
Keep the source behind every result. Let authorised people review material differences and approve the next step.
Connect records | Match transactions | Explain breaks | Review exceptions | Record closure
Source A · Bank
••47 · Settlement reference
Date · Amount · Currency · Identifier
Source B · Ledger
Entry ••92 · Approved period
Mapped date · Amount · Reference
Proposed Match
Amount and reference align. Date tolerance remains visible.
Review Exception
Evidence is incomplete. Assigned review is required.
Reconciliation starts with two or more views of the same financial event. Fields, timing, labels, and detail may differ.
Bank, processor, custodian, broker, platform, or operational record.
Ledger, settlement record, internal file, or approved comparison source.
Fields, tolerances, date rules, grouping logic, and transformations.
Proposed, confirmed, exception, duplicate, missing, or awaiting evidence.
Owner, reason, evidence, comments, approval, and closure status.
A close amount is not always the same transaction. The workflow must retain the evidence behind the proposed match.
Financial reconciliation compares related records to confirm whether they agree. It also identifies differences that need explanation or action.
Records may come from banks, ledgers, payment providers, settlement files, custodians, brokers, or platforms. Automated reconciliation applies configured rules at scale.
Mimasa connects matching with evidence and workflow. It is not an ERP, ledger, bank, processor, custodian, broker, or system of record.
Sources are mapped to the correct period, entity, account, and currency.
Rules or AI suggest one-to-one, grouped, or one-to-many matches with their basis.
Missing records, timing gaps, duplicates, amount differences, and unsupported transformations remain visible.
An authorised person confirms, requests evidence, changes the reason, or reassigns the item.
The workflow records the final status, evidence, reviewer, approved action, and completion time.
This structure turns reconciliation automation into controlled work without hiding difficult items behind one completion rate.
Bank reconciliation compares bank activity with internal records. Timing, fees, missing entries, duplicates, reversals, and mapping errors can create differences.
Bank account reconciliation can map accounts and periods, apply exact rules, prepare AI-assisted suggestions, and preserve evidence.
Bank reconciliation automation should expose rule changes and unusual matches. Automated bank reconciliation must distinguish a suggestion from a confirmed result.
AI bank reconciliation can interpret varied descriptions. Bank statement reconciliation remains dependent on a verified source method.
Payment reconciliation connects payment events with processor, settlement, bank, merchant, and internal records.
Payment event → Processor record → Settlement batch → Bank movement → Internal record → Reviewed exception
Automated payment reconciliation applies configured identifiers and tolerances. Payment reconciliation automation creates an exception when records are absent.
Credit card reconciliation compares masked activity, fees, refunds, chargebacks, batches, settlements, and internal records.
Payment reconciliation software should preserve the path to the final record. The processor remains responsible for payment and settlement functions.
Cash reconciliation compares bank accounts, internal books, settlement sources, and approved treasury data.
Automated cash reconciliation can apply date and currency rules, identify missing movements, separate timing differences, and route unresolved items.
Treasury teams retain cash decisions. Liquidity, positioning, forecasting, exposure, and scenarios belong to treasury intelligence.
Data reconciliation checks whether related data agrees across sources. A technical field match may not confirm the correct financial relationship.
Account reconciliation supports preparation, matching, explanation, review, and sign-off. The account reconciliation process remains governed by finance policy.
General ledger reconciliation checks balances against subledgers and evidence. Ledger reconciliation can expose missing or duplicate entries.
Balance sheet reconciliation is a broad accounting control. Finance & Accounting retains primary ownership of this cross-industry work.
Intercompany reconciliation compares related entries across entities. It may need mapping, currency rules, timing treatment, and agreed ownership.
Investment reconciliation compares approved positions, cash, trades, fees, income, and related records. Mimasa does not provide investment advice.
Securities reconciliation can compare trade, position, cash, settlement, and reference data. An operations specialist confirms the cause and resolution.
Every unmatched item needs a clear reason, supporting evidence, owner, and controlled next step.
| Exception Type | Workspace Evidence | Possible Next Step |
|---|---|---|
| Missing record | Expected source, period, identifier, and absent side | Request the missing record |
| Timing difference | Dates, cut-off rule, and expected posting window | Monitor until the approved review date |
| Amount difference | Both amounts, currency, tolerance, and transformation | Check fee, tax, FX, or source data |
| Duplicate | Candidate records and shared identifiers | Review before exclusion or reversal |
| Reference conflict | Conflicting account, transaction, or entity references | Correct mapping through approval |
| Grouping difference | Records behind a proposed grouped match | Confirm logic and completeness |
| Unsupported match | Low confidence or missing evidence | Send to an authorised reviewer |
| Process break | Failed source, mapping, rule, or downstream step | Assign an owner and retry safely |
AI can draft an evidence-based explanation. The reviewer decides the final reason and action.
AI reconciliation can help with varied descriptions and complex grouping. It should not operate as an unexplained score.
Transaction matching software finds links. Mimasa adds source evidence, exception routing, approvals, and review history.
AI account reconciliation supports candidate matching and summary preparation. AI reconciliation software must follow approved account and review rules.
Build Governed AI AgentsChecks source, period, entity, account, schema, and required fields. It flags incomplete input.
Applies exact, tolerant, grouped, and AI-assisted methods. It exposes the basis of each proposal.
Collects related evidence and drafts a concise break summary without inventing unsupported reasons.
Routes items, monitors due dates, requests approvals, and records completion within assigned permissions.
Buyers may compare reconciliation software, reconciliation tools, and specialist platforms. Strong solutions connect matching with evidence and action.
Account reconciliation software and account reconciliation tools often focus on finance controls. Bank account reconciliation software focuses on bank-to-book comparisons.
Financial reconciliation software must not hide the difference between a proposal and an approved result.
Automated reconciliation software applies configured rules. AI reconciliation software can assist with descriptions, grouping, and exception summaries.
| Capability | Rules-Based Automation | AI-Assisted Reconciliation | Required Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exact identifiers | Match agreed fields | Not required for a clear match | Validate fields and sources |
| Date or amount tolerance | Apply configured thresholds | Rank plausible candidates | Show the tolerance used |
| Varied descriptions | Normalise or use a lookup | Compare approved text context | Expose supporting fields |
| One-to-many match | Apply a grouping rule | Suggest a candidate group | Confirm completeness and totals |
| Exception reason | Use an explicit rule outcome | Draft from source evidence | Review material items |
| Next step | Route by configured status | Suggest a workflow path | Check permission and approval |
Use rules when the relationship is clear. Use AI where judgement helps. Keep human review where consequences matter.
Account reconciliation automation can assign preparers, reviewers, due dates, evidence, and sign-offs without removing ownership.
Automated account reconciliation applies trusted rules to known records. New sources and material exceptions need stronger review.
A configurable view should show operating states without fabricated performance values.
Mimasa works around existing systems where access and integration are configured.
It does not become the authoritative financial system because it connects approved records.
Preserve source, amount, currency, date, identifier, rule, and review status for every material result.
Material journals, adjustments, write-offs, settlement actions, and closure require authorised control. Mimasa does not provide accounting, tax, legal, or investment advice.
01
Start with known sources, clear owners, repeatable rules, and a measurable exception process.
02
Define entities, accounts, identifiers, dates, currencies, signs, periods, and expected relationships.
03
Agree exact matches, tolerances, grouping, materiality, approvals, and prohibited actions.
04
Test missing records, partial settlements, duplicates, reversals, fees, and mapping changes.
05
Review proposals, exceptions, overrides, and failures while the first scope stays controlled.
06
Use confirmed causes and reviewer corrections to improve mappings, rules, and workflow design.
Connect bank, ledger, payment, cash, settlement, and investment information without replacing source systems.
Show why records were linked and which authorised data supports the proposal.
Route each break with its reason, evidence, owner, deadline, and review status.
Use AI for ambiguity and summaries while people control material outcomes.
Preserve source data, rules, overrides, approvals, and final status.
Operate in cloud, private-cloud, or on-premises environments based on enterprise needs.
Investigate payment and settlement exceptions after matching.
Analyse liquidity, forecasts, exposures, and maturities.
Research investments using approved information.
Collect evidence and track configured control findings.
Extract and validate financial information from statements.
Clear answers about financial reconciliation, AI-assisted matching, exceptions, controls, and existing systems.
Connect financial records, AI-assisted matching, evidence, exceptions, and human review. Start with one bounded reconciliation and build from verified results.