Alert Received
Record the approved source, time, reason, and existing risk context.
Turn scattered bank fraud alerts into connected evidence, clear timelines, assigned tasks, and review-ready cases.
Mimasa AI helps investigators enrich alerts and understand related activity. It works with existing detection systems while authorised teams retain control of every outcome.
Connect approved customer, account, transaction, device, merchant, alert, and case data within one governed workflow.
Record the approved source, time, reason, and existing risk context.
Retrieve permitted customer, account, transaction, device, merchant, channel, and prior-case information.
Show related people, entities, accounts, events, and identifiers in a reviewable relationship view.
An investigator checks evidence, records findings, assigns actions, and routes sensitive decisions.
Record the approved source, time, reason, and existing risk context.
Retrieve permitted customer, account, transaction, device, merchant, channel, and prior-case information.
Show related people, entities, accounts, events, and identifiers in a reviewable relationship view.
An investigator checks evidence, records findings, assigns actions, and routes sensitive decisions.
The alert starts the investigation. It does not decide the outcome.
AI fraud detection can identify patterns, anomalies, or events that may need attention. Banking fraud detection systems may score transactions or take permitted real-time actions.
Mimasa focuses on the investigation layer around bank fraud alerts. Investigators still control evidence, conclusions, escalations, customer-impacting actions, and case closure.
| Capability | Primary Owner | Mimasa Role |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time transaction scoring | Existing fraud or payment system | Receive approved alerts and scores |
| Native payment or channel control | Existing banking platform | Route a permitted action for approval or invoke an approved integration |
| Investigation context | Fraud operations | Gather and organise approved evidence |
| Relationship analysis | Investigation workflow | Connect relevant entities and activity for review |
| Case work | Investigation team | Coordinate tasks, findings, escalations, and approvals |
| Final disposition | Authorised bank employee | Record the reviewed decision and rationale |
A fraud investigation workflow is the controlled path used to review a suspicious event. It covers intake, enrichment, analysis, evidence, collaboration, decisions, and closure.
Mimasa connects those steps across approved data and tools. Human investigators remain responsible for conclusions and customer-impacting actions.
Not every alert needs the same path. Mimasa can enrich each alert with configured information before assignment.
The system may recommend a priority based on approved rules. An authorised employee can change it and record the reason.
Fraud link analysis connects people, businesses, accounts, transactions, devices, merchants, beneficiaries, locations, and cases.
Selecting a relationship should reveal its source and type. An inferred link must not appear as a confirmed fact.
Which accounts share a device or identifier?
Which beneficiaries appear across several alerts?
Does this event connect to an earlier case?
Which transactions form a relevant sequence?
Are several alerts part of one investigation?
Which links need further evidence?
The graph supports review. It does not prove fraud by itself.
Each event should link to its source. Missing periods should remain visible.
An AI-generated timeline must separate source facts from interpretations. Reviewers should be able to challenge both.
The workspace supports evidence, tasks, and decisions, not only a dashboard.
Each task needs an owner, status, priority, and deadline. Sensitive evidence follows role-based access rules.
Mimasa can organise approved notes, exports, evidence, and messages into a source-linked draft investigation report.
The investigator reviews and completes the report. Regulatory filing requires a separate approved workflow and authorised action.
Banking fraud analytics can show queues, patterns, workload, and outcomes without exposing cases to unauthorised users.
Definitions depend on the bank's data and controls. Mimasa does not present invented results.
AI agents for fraud investigation can coordinate approved steps across data, tools, and teams. Each agent works within defined access and action limits.
Agentic AI fraud investigation means coordinated repeatable work. It does not mean agents independently conclude that fraud occurred.
Fraud investigation AI agents can prepare evidence and workflow actions for review.
Connect alerts with customers, accounts, beneficiaries, merchants, channels, devices, and transaction history.
Review profile changes, authentication events, devices, sessions, payments, customer contact, and related cases.
Bring together approved application, identity, account, device, and behavioural context. Keep identity checks with authoritative systems.
Map relationships across accounts, beneficiaries, transactions, identifiers, and earlier alerts. Treat network links as evidence to review.
Use strictly controlled access and follow the bank's investigation and employment policies.
Adapt the same evidence, timeline, ownership, and approval pattern to the data available for each channel.
Fraud analytics software may detect anomalies, generate scores, or analyse patterns. Detection platforms may also act in real time.
Mimasa works around these platforms. It connects approved alerts with wider case context, tasks, evidence, and human decisions.
Each exception needs an owner, reason, evidence, status, and next step.
Begin with a defined alert source and investigation path. Choose a workflow with understood data, ownership, and decision rules.
Fraud cases contain sensitive customer, transaction, identity, employee, and investigation data. Access stays limited throughout the workflow.
Mimasa supports cloud, private-cloud, and on-premise deployment. Banks decide which users and agents can access each source, case, tool, and action.
Discuss Security And Deployment RequirementsCommon questions about alert enrichment, fraud link analysis, investigation workflows, reports, agents, and human control.
Extract configured information from investigation documents and evidence.
Standardise approved alert, customer, account, and transaction data.
Control case access, datasets, permissions, and traceability.
Explore relationships, timelines, queues, and investigation measures.
Build controlled agents for alert enrichment and case preparation.
Coordinate tasks, escalations, reviews, and approvals.
Keep investigators, reviewers, tasks, discussions, and case context together.
Explore governed intelligence and automation around existing banking systems.
See the connected intelligence layer across BFSI.
Connect evidence, analysis, decisions, and controlled action.
Coordinate regulatory reporting and compliance review after an investigation.
Browse enterprise AI workflows by industry and function.
Connect approved alerts, evidence, relationships, tasks, and human decisions in one governed investigation room.