Mimasa AI™
Banking · Fraud And Financial Crime Operations

AI Fraud Investigation Software For Banking Teams

Turn scattered bank fraud alerts into connected evidence, clear timelines, assigned tasks, and review-ready cases.

Mimasa AI helps investigators enrich alerts and understand related activity. It works with existing detection systems while authorised teams retain control of every outcome.

Connect approved customer, account, transaction, device, merchant, alert, and case data within one governed workflow.

Zone 01

Alert Received

Record the approved source, time, reason, and existing risk context.

Zone 02

Context Gathered

Retrieve permitted customer, account, transaction, device, merchant, channel, and prior-case information.

Zone 03

Connections Mapped

Show related people, entities, accounts, events, and identifiers in a reviewable relationship view.

Zone 04

Case Reviewed

An investigator checks evidence, records findings, assigns actions, and routes sensitive decisions.

AI fraud investigation software connecting bank alerts, evidence, timelines, and human review.
One Alert, Four Zones

Follow One Alert Through The Investigation Room

01

Alert Received

Record the approved source, time, reason, and existing risk context.

02

Context Gathered

Retrieve permitted customer, account, transaction, device, merchant, channel, and prior-case information.

03

Connections Mapped

Show related people, entities, accounts, events, and identifiers in a reviewable relationship view.

04

Case Reviewed

An investigator checks evidence, records findings, assigns actions, and routes sensitive decisions.

The alert starts the investigation. It does not decide the outcome.

Clear Boundary

Detection Finds A Signal. Investigation Builds The Case.

AI fraud detection can identify patterns, anomalies, or events that may need attention. Banking fraud detection systems may score transactions or take permitted real-time actions.

Mimasa focuses on the investigation layer around bank fraud alerts. Investigators still control evidence, conclusions, escalations, customer-impacting actions, and case closure.

CapabilityPrimary OwnerMimasa Role
Real-time transaction scoringExisting fraud or payment systemReceive approved alerts and scores
Native payment or channel controlExisting banking platformRoute a permitted action for approval or invoke an approved integration
Investigation contextFraud operationsGather and organise approved evidence
Relationship analysisInvestigation workflowConnect relevant entities and activity for review
Case workInvestigation teamCoordinate tasks, findings, escalations, and approvals
Final dispositionAuthorised bank employeeRecord the reviewed decision and rationale
Direct Answer

What Is A Fraud Investigation Workflow?

A fraud investigation workflow is the controlled path used to review a suspicious event. It covers intake, enrichment, analysis, evidence, collaboration, decisions, and closure.

Mimasa connects those steps across approved data and tools. Human investigators remain responsible for conclusions and customer-impacting actions.

Alert Triage

Triage Bank Fraud Alerts With Better Context

Not every alert needs the same path. Mimasa can enrich each alert with configured information before assignment.

The system may recommend a priority based on approved rules. An authorised employee can change it and record the reason.

  • Alert source and trigger
  • Customer and account context
  • Transaction amount, time, and channel
  • Device, location, merchant, or beneficiary details
  • Related alerts and earlier cases
  • Available risk or model outputs
  • Missing information
  • Suggested review path
  • Current owner and service deadline
Relationship View

Reveal Hidden Connections With Fraud Link Analysis

Fraud link analysis connects people, businesses, accounts, transactions, devices, merchants, beneficiaries, locations, and cases.

Selecting a relationship should reveal its source and type. An inferred link must not appear as a confirmed fact.

  • Customer or entity
  • Account or payment instrument
  • Transaction or transfer
  • Device or session
  • Merchant or beneficiary
  • Address, phone, email, or identifier
  • Alert or investigation case

Which accounts share a device or identifier?

Which beneficiaries appear across several alerts?

Does this event connect to an earlier case?

Which transactions form a relevant sequence?

Are several alerts part of one investigation?

Which links need further evidence?

The graph supports review. It does not prove fraud by itself.

Source-Linked Timeline

Build An Evidence Timeline Before Writing The Conclusion

Each event should link to its source. Missing periods should remain visible.

An AI-generated timeline must separate source facts from interpretations. Reviewers should be able to challenge both.

  1. 01 · Account or profile changes
  2. 02 · Authentication or device events
  3. 03 · Payment attempts and completed transactions
  4. 04 · Beneficiary additions
  5. 05 · Customer communications
  6. 06 · Alerts from connected systems
  7. 07 · Investigator queries and findings
  8. 08 · Requests for more information
  9. 09 · Approved actions and decisions
Case Record

Fraud Investigation Software Keeps The Full Case Together

The workspace supports evidence, tasks, and decisions, not only a dashboard.

  • Alert sources and related signals
  • Customer and account context
  • Linked entities and transactions
  • Evidence files and source records
  • Investigator notes and questions
  • Assigned tasks and due dates
  • Findings and unresolved points
  • Review and escalation history
  • Approved actions
  • Final disposition and rationale

Each task needs an owner, status, priority, and deadline. Sensitive evidence follows role-based access rules.

Review-Ready Report

Move From Notes To A Consistent Draft

Mimasa can organise approved notes, exports, evidence, and messages into a source-linked draft investigation report.

  • Alert and case summary
  • People, accounts, and entities reviewed
  • Relevant transaction sequence
  • Relationship findings
  • Evidence considered
  • Conflicting or missing information
  • Investigator assessment
  • Recommended next step
  • Required review or escalation
  • Decision and approval record

The investigator reviews and completes the report. Regulatory filing requires a separate approved workflow and authorised action.

Workload View

Use Banking Fraud Analytics To Manage The Workload

Banking fraud analytics can show queues, patterns, workload, and outcomes without exposing cases to unauthorised users.

Definitions depend on the bank's data and controls. Mimasa does not present invented results.

  • Alerts received by source and type
  • Alerts awaiting triage
  • Cases opened, merged, escalated, or closed
  • Queue age by team and priority
  • Cases waiting for evidence
  • Related alerts per case
  • Investigation tasks due or overdue
  • Case outcomes by approved category
  • Reopened cases and review reasons
  • Workload by investigator or team
  • Common alert-to-case paths
  • Data gaps affecting investigation
Controlled Agents

Add AI Agents Without Removing Investigator Control

AI Agents For Fraud Investigation

AI agents for fraud investigation can coordinate approved steps across data, tools, and teams. Each agent works within defined access and action limits.

Agentic AI fraud investigation means coordinated repeatable work. It does not mean agents independently conclude that fraud occurred.

Fraud investigation AI agents can prepare evidence and workflow actions for review.

  • Monitor an approved alert queue.
  • Gather permitted customer and transaction context.
  • Search for related alerts, entities, and prior cases.
  • Build a source-linked event timeline.
  • Prepare a relationship map for review.
  • Summarise case evidence and open questions.
  • Create tasks and route them to the right team.
  • Draft investigation notes and reports.
  • Escalate cases under configured rules.
  • Pause before sensitive or customer-impacting actions.
Banking Fraud Types

Apply The Investigation Room Across Banking Fraud Types

Payment And Transaction Fraud

Connect alerts with customers, accounts, beneficiaries, merchants, channels, devices, and transaction history.

Account Takeover

Review profile changes, authentication events, devices, sessions, payments, customer contact, and related cases.

Application And Identity Fraud

Bring together approved application, identity, account, device, and behavioural context. Keep identity checks with authoritative systems.

Mule-Account Investigations

Map relationships across accounts, beneficiaries, transactions, identifiers, and earlier alerts. Treat network links as evidence to review.

Insider Or Employee-Related Cases

Use strictly controlled access and follow the bank's investigation and employment policies.

Check, Card, And Digital-Channel Fraud

Adapt the same evidence, timeline, ownership, and approval pattern to the data available for each channel.

System Boundary

Fraud Analytics Software Or An Investigation Layer?

Fraud analytics software may detect anomalies, generate scores, or analyse patterns. Detection platforms may also act in real time.

Mimasa works around these platforms. It connects approved alerts with wider case context, tasks, evidence, and human decisions.

Difficult Cases

Design For Unclear Or Incomplete Evidence

  • Alert source is unavailable
  • Customer or account record does not match
  • Transaction history is incomplete
  • Entity relationship needs confirmation
  • Earlier case access is restricted
  • Evidence conflicts across systems
  • Required task is overdue
  • Reviewer disagrees with the prepared summary
  • Customer-impacting action needs added approval

Each exception needs an owner, reason, evidence, status, and next step.

Start Focused

Start With One Alert Type

Begin with a defined alert source and investigation path. Choose a workflow with understood data, ownership, and decision rules.

  1. Step 01Select the alert type and investigation outcome.
  2. Step 02Map sources, fields, evidence, tasks, and authorities.
  3. Step 03Define access rules and customer-impacting action gates.
  4. Step 04Configure enrichment, links, timelines, and report sections.
  5. Step 05Test normal alerts, false positives, and complex cases.
  6. Step 06Compare prepared cases with investigator-reviewed outcomes.
  7. Step 07Validate audit records, permissions, and escalation paths.
  8. Step 08Expand only after the bank accepts the controls.
Security And Governance

Protect Sensitive Investigation Work

Fraud cases contain sensitive customer, transaction, identity, employee, and investigation data. Access stays limited throughout the workflow.

Mimasa supports cloud, private-cloud, and on-premise deployment. Banks decide which users and agents can access each source, case, tool, and action.

Discuss Security And Deployment Requirements
  • Role-based access control
  • Case-level and source-level permissions
  • Human approval checkpoints
  • Limits on agent tools and actions
  • Source-linked summaries and timelines
  • Evidence and decision audit trails
  • Separate access for investigation teams
  • Configurable retention and integration patterns
  • Governed datasets and reusable snapshots

Banking Fraud Investigation FAQs

Common questions about alert enrichment, fraud link analysis, investigation workflows, reports, agents, and human control.

Build A Reviewable Fraud Investigation Workflow

Connect approved alerts, evidence, relationships, tasks, and human decisions in one governed investigation room.